Saturday, 10 December 2016

The real benefit scroungers and cheats



Who are the real benefit scroungers?  Yes there are people out there that have never worked a day of their lives.  Yes there are junkies and alcoholics who are a drain on resource they don’t know what day of the week it is and will never be clean or sober enough to ever work.

But almost everyone on benefits wants to work but just can’t find a job no matter how hard they try, how many applications they fill in and how many interviews they go on. These are people who want a job, want to contribute to society and make a better life for them and their family.  These are not the scroungers who are bleeding the system dry and have to pay for everyday things “TOOTH PASTE” and cleaning their own cloths

David Lidington conservative Member of Parliament for Aylesbury attempted to justify his claims of fairness:


    “I think the principle remains right that while staff should always behave with courtesy towards people seeking to claim benefits, it is also right that we should expect people who are receiving benefits to be subject to the kind of disciplines that apply to people in work even if they are on low pay”.

But are Conservative MPs subject to the same disciplines? Benefit claimants living off around £70 a week may find it difficult to accept lectures on fairness from MPs like Lidington.  The MP for Aylesbury once claimed £1,300 of public money for his dry-cleaning. He also made claims for toothpaste, shower gel and body spray. Lidington has been criticised for claiming almost double his salary in expenses. From an objective standpoint, Lidington is a benefit claimant costing us a massive amount more than an ordinary claimant.

Also, if we’re talking fairness with public funds, the Conservatives’ austerity programme has piled on more debt than every post-war Labour government combined.  Chronic under-investment in public services (cuts) only increases debt.

If people have jobs which pay at minimum the living wage they would not be on benefit. They would pay tax and national insurance.  They would not need council tax or housing benefit.  They would spend their money on goods and services and in turn this would boost the economy. 

Common sense, the conservative government don’t do common sense they do greedy short term line your pockets first “F**K YOU” approach.  The rich get rich everyone else gets F**KED.

For more go to:  http://betterapart.blogspot.co.uk/

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

May has revealed who’s guiding Brexit



Theresa May has revealed who’s guiding her Brexit negotiations: God. But fortunately, LBC host James O’Brien had a truth bomb at the ready:
What if Sadiq Khan came out and said ‘I’ve decided to hire a night Tsar because Allah told me to’?
Bravo. The corporate tabloids and their readers would likely be in uproar over such a comment from the London Mayor. For O’Brien, this outrage should apply to Christianity having influence over politics as well as Islam. His point is that any religion should be kept well away from parliament:
That chills me to the core when politicians come out and cite some form of divine legitimacy for their political decisions. Such claims of divine legitimacy appear to have been dangerous in the past. Tony Blair’s old long-term political agent said the former Prime Minister viewed Iraq as a “Christian battle”. O’Brien noted the similar claims of Blair’s American counterpart in his LBC commentary:

It’s like George W. Bush saying that God told him to invade Iraq. The political commentator finished his two cents by elaborating on the double standard. And he was unequivocal:
If you wanted to give me a slap for saying Theresa May probably shouldn’t bring God into conversations about Brexit, then you also have to be in favour of and cheerleading if someone of a different faith, and I’ll pick a Muslim mayor off the top of my head, says that he uses his faith in order to make his political decisions. You can’t like one and not like the other. Religion either has a role in public life or it doesn’t.
In short, O’Brien thinks faith should be separate from politics. But Karl Marx would argue that religion does have a fundamental political function. For the ruling elites. Religion suppresses ordinary people because it teaches that social justice will be achieved in the afterlife. It gives people false hope and encourages passivity. While this is worth considering, May appropriating Christianity for her own legislative decisions takes the politicisation of religion to another level. As O’Brien argues, there is no place for it in a modern society.
Thanks to the Canary
Please follow the link to see the full video
http://www.thecanary.co/2016/11/29/now-may-revealed-whos-guiding-brexit-obrien-sums-outrage-single-sentence-video/